Type I – I want to change you

Interesting. I think change is good if it has good logic behind it and you are willing to give up the other logics that prompted you to do something different before. Or you can combine the two logics also and come up with a solution that both you and that “want to change” commentor can like.

I think such commentors are passionate about their feelings, but can somehow be really aggressive without looking at the other side.

I like your approach, since I got my idea from you! Changing and apologizing to the commentor is good, though I am starting to become really concerned about people who get apologies and think they were right all along instead of wondering “Wow, he/she changed. Maybe I was wrong? Let me see..”

Type II – I don’t like you, or anything you have to say

You bring up a good point; that is, to see how and why someone is acting so aggressive. lol @ logical fallacy.

Type III – I have a been to pick. But it’s not with you

Yes, this is a good one. Usually, even if a commentor sounds like he/she is attacking your personally, you yourself have to bring back the focus to the issue instead of yourself.

Researching a commentor is also a very crucial steps. In order to communicate with people, you have to find out more about them.

Good points Ronald. Looking forward to seeing more types of negative commentors.